What we publish, and what we refuse to.

Every figure in our guides is computed, not recalled. The worked examples, tables and probabilities are produced by the same open-source math library that powers the calculators, and they are checked against it before publication — so a number in an article and the same number from the tool cannot disagree.

Every calculator states its formula and its assumptions on the page. Where a method has a known limitation — proportional vig removal being biased on lopsided markets, for instance, or a simulation understating real-world variance — we say so on the page rather than in a footnote.

We do not publish statistics we cannot compute or source. That specifically includes the ones this industry invents most freely: search volumes, traffic figures, unverifiable historical win rates, and the value of a specific half-point without the historical margin distribution behind it. Where a number of that kind would be useful and we do not have it, the page says we do not have it.

• Losses are published exactly like wins. The public record is the complete set, not a selection. A record that only contains winners is not a record.
• Picks are graded at the price and line they were posted at — not at a better number found afterwards.
• Nothing is deleted. Losing picks stay up. Removing them would destroy the only thing that makes the rest of the record worth reading.
• Results are reported in units,so the record is comparable regardless of anyone’s bankroll, and profit is not flattered by stake size.
• Sample data is labelled as sample data. Where a page is running on placeholder figures rather than live results, it says so on the page itself.

• Guaranteed-win language.No “locks”, no “can’t lose”, no guaranteed anything. Every bet can lose, and any page implying otherwise is lying to you.
• Fabricated testimonials or doctored bet slips. Invented reviews, edited screenshots and staged winnings are standard in this category. We do not publish them.
• Fake review or rating markup. Structured data claiming aggregate ratings or reviews that do not exist is invisible to readers and visible to search engines, which is precisely what makes it dishonest. Our pages carry none.
• Invented authors. We would rather attribute a guide to the organisation than manufacture an expert with a stock photograph and a fictional record.
• Betting advice dressed as certainty. Our content is information and analysis. It is not financial advice, and no strategy on this site makes a negative-expectation bet profitable.

Every guide shows the date it was published and, where it has been revised, the date it was last updated. Those dates move when the content changes — not on every deploy. A page whose “updated” date resets each time the site is rebuilt is telling you nothing.

Educational guides are currently attributed to ProPickz as an organisation rather than to an individual writer, and our structured data says exactly that. When named editorial staff and their public track records exist, attribution will move to them. We are not inventing bylines in the meantime.

We publish computed figures, which means an error here is a wrong number rather than a matter of opinion — and wrong numbers get fixed.

If you find one, email support@propickz.com with the page and the figure. Substantive corrections are made to the page and the “last updated” date moves with them. We do not quietly edit a published result.

ProPickz sells memberships, which grant access to a private Discord where premium picks are posted. That is the commercial relationship, and it is why every page on this site eventually points toward it.

It also means our incentive is disclosed rather than hidden: we benefit if you subscribe. The counterweight is that the record is public and includes the losses, and the calculators are free, complete and require no account — they work perfectly well for someone who never gives us a cent, which is deliberate.

Where any other commercial relationship affects what appears on a page, it is disclosed on that page.

This is a category where the product can hurt people, and treating that as a compliance checkbox is its own kind of dishonesty. Every page carries an age statement and a helpline, no page promises an outcome, and our responsible gambling page leads with help rather than with disclaimers.